Explore how differences in sector focus and portfolio breadth shape the income and growth profiles of these two dividend ETFs.Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD 0.07%) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM +0.33%) both target dividend-paying U.S. stocks, but differ in sector tilt, portfolio concentration, and yield.Both SCHD and VYM are popular, low-cost options for investors seeking dividend income from U.S. equities. While they share a focus on high-yielding stocks, their approaches to sector alloc ...

Fee structure, sector focus, and risk profiles set these two high-dividend ETFs apart for income-minded investors.Both the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM +0.33%) and the Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV +0.41%) aim to provide exposure to U.S. companies with above-average dividend yields, but they approach this goal in different ways.FDVV uses a sector-constrained approach, while VYM tracks a broad, rules-based index of high-yielding stocks -- resulting in some notable differences in cost, portfolio m ...

核心观点 - Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) 和 iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) 均投资于美国股息股，但策略不同 VIG偏向增长和科技板块 HDV侧重高股息和防御性板块 [1] 成本与规模 - VIG的费用比率为0.05% 低于HDV的0.08% [3] - HDV的股息收益率为3.09% 显著高于VIG的1.64% [3] - VIG的资产管理规模为1151亿美元 远高于HDV的117亿美元 [3] 业绩与风险 - 截至2025年11月30日 VIG的一年期总回报率为8.79% 高于HDV的2.26% [3] - 过去5年 投资VIG的1000美元增长至1605美元 而投资HDV增长至1411美元 [4] - HDV的5年贝塔值为0.62 最大回撤为-16.52% 显示其波动性和风险低于VIG（贝塔值0.86 最大回撤-20.40%）[3][4] 投资组合构成 - VIG持有338只股票 行业配置偏向科技（29%）、金融服务业（22%）和医疗保健（16%）前三大持仓为博通、微软和苹果 [5] - HDV持有75只股票 投资组合更集中 主要配置必需消费品（25%）、医疗保健（22%）和能源（21%）前三大持仓为埃克森美孚、强生和雪佛龙 [6] 基金特点与吸引力 - HDV因其投资于防御性板块和成熟公司 预计未来波动性较低 稳定性更高 [7][8] - VIG专注于有持续股息增长记录的公司 因其科技板块倾向 具备更高的总回报增长潜力 [9][10]